Geopolitical analysis across regions and the powers that shape themRegions & Powers

Where regions meet powers: Türkiye's view, from primary sources

Regions & Powers is a geopolitical analysis publication that reads the Eastern Mediterranean, Black Sea, Caucasus, Middle East and Balkans together with the powers that shape them. It explains regional affairs in plain English and presents Türkiye's official perspective and legal positions, attributed to treaties, UN documents, archives and government statements.

Diplomatic Briefing· Turkish defense industry domestic production rate

Türkiye's Defense Industry at 80% Domestic Production: Bayraktar, KAAN, TCG Anadolu and Hisar-O

How the Turkish defense industry domestic production rate near 80% shapes deterrence, NATO ties and regional balances, from Bayraktar to KAAN and Hisar-O.

R&P
Published:
⏱ 9 min read (1,930 words)

Why It Matters

Türkiye's defense industry is officially described as roughly 80% indigenous, meaning about four-fifths of major defense programs are developed or produced domestically, compared with roughly one-fifth in the early 2000s, according to the Presidency of Defence Industries (SSB). That shift gives Ankara strategic autonomy: it can sustain operations, adapt systems quickly and export, even when foreign suppliers hesitate. Ankara says this strengthens NATO's southeastern flank; critics ask how exports are governed and what the growth means for neighbours.

The headline number needs care. It is an official, program-based estimate. Foreign engines, licensed designs and some electronics remain in important platforms, and this article marks those points where they are publicly documented.

Background

The push for self-reliance began with an arms-supply shock. After the 20 July 1974 Cyprus Peace Operation, the United States imposed an arms embargo on Türkiye (1975–1978). Ankara's official narrative treats this as the founding lesson of its industrial policy. ASELSAN (electronics) was established in 1975, and a central procurement authority was created in 1985. Roketsan (missiles) followed in 1988. In 2018 the procurement body, now called SSB, was placed directly under the Presidency.

Key milestones

Year Milestone
1975 ASELSAN founded; US arms embargo begins (lifted 1978)
1988 Roketsan founded
2011 First MİLGEM corvette, TCG Heybeliada, enters service
2018 SSB placed under the Presidency
2019 Türkiye removed from the F-35 program after taking delivery of the Russian S-400 system
2020 US CAATSA sanctions on SSB (December); Bayraktar TB2 prominent in Libya and Nagorno-Karabakh
2022 Kızılelma unmanned combat aircraft first flight (14 December)
2023 TCG Anadolu commissioned (10 April); Hürjet first flight (25 April)
2024 KAAN fifth-generation fighter prototype first flight (21 February)

Another turning point came in October 2019. Several European governments restricted arms sales to Türkiye after Operation Peace Spring in northern Syria. Canada suspended export permits for optical sensors used on the TB2 in 2020, later cancelling them. Sweden and Finland agreed to lift their restrictions in the trilateral memorandum with Türkiye signed at the NATO Madrid Summit on 28 June 2022. Ankara cites these episodes as proof that dependence is a vulnerability.

What 'about 80% domestic' covers

The table below summarizes the main domains and, where publicly documented, the foreign content. This is the most useful way to read the headline figure.

Domain Examples Documented foreign content or licence
UAV/UCAV Bayraktar TB2, Akıncı, Aksungur, Kızılelma Engine sourcing has varied, including Western and Ukrainian-designed engines; Turkish engines are being introduced
Aircraft Hürjet, Hürkuş, T129 ATAK, KAAN T129 is derived from an Italian design with Turkish mission systems; KAAN prototypes use US-made engines while a Turkish engine is developed
Land systems Fırtına howitzer, Kirpi armored vehicle, MEMATT unmanned demining vehicle Fırtına derives from a South Korean licensed design
Naval TCG Anadolu, MİLGEM corvettes and frigates, Reis-class submarines Anadolu is based on a Spanish design; Reis-class is built under a German Type 214 licence
Missiles and air defense SOM, ATMACA, HİSAR-O, SİPER Largely Turkish-developed by TÜBİTAK SAGE, Roketsan and ASELSAN
Electronic warfare KORAL, MİLKED Turkish-developed (ASELSAN and national partners)

Exports and industrial scale

According to SSB figures, Turkish defense and aerospace exports reached about 5.5 billion USD in 2023 and about 7.1 billion USD in 2024. Baykar's 2022 acquisition of Italy's Piaggio Aerospace and its 2025 joint venture announcement with Leonardo show that Turkish firms now also invest in the European defense market.

Key Players & Positions

  • Türkiye (SSB, Ministry of National Defence, TUSAŞ, Baykar, ASELSAN, Roketsan, MKE): Treats domestic production as a matter of survival and sovereignty, and cites the 1975–1978 embargo and later export restrictions as evidence.
  • NATO and the United States: NATO's official line welcomes allied investment in defense capacity and sets spending goals. At the 2025 Hague Summit, Allies agreed to a 5% of GDP target for defense and related security spending. Washington's disagreement with Ankara centres on the S-400 purchase, which led to Türkiye's F-35 exclusion and CAATSA sanctions. The US government has argued that the S-400 is incompatible with NATO systems and the F-35.
  • European governments: Positions are mixed. Several imposed arms-export restrictions in 2019, and some later eased them. Others, like Italy, Poland and the UK, have cooperated with Turkish firms or bought Turkish systems. Parliamentary debates in some countries continue over licensing decisions.
  • Greece and the Republic of Cyprus: Both view Turkish naval and air expansion through the lens of the Aegean and Eastern Mediterranean disputes. Athens has expanded its own capacity, including an announced multi-year air-defense program in 2025, and has bought Rafale aircraft and F-35s.
  • Customers and partners: Azerbaijan, Ukraine, Poland, Indonesia, Gulf states and several African countries have bought or contracted Turkish systems, according to government and company announcements.
  • UN bodies and human rights groups: Reports by the UN Panel of Experts on Libya referred to foreign arms deliveries, including Turkish ones, during the Libyan conflict. NGOs have also raised questions about the use of armed drones in conflicts. Ankara answers that its support to Libya's internationally recognized government rested on bilateral agreements and that its systems are used under international humanitarian law.

Does the growth change regional balances?

It changes them at the margins, not at the foundations. Three effects are widely observed:

  1. Cost-exchange and reach: Armed UAVs and long-range munitions let mid-sized powers project precision force at lower cost, which changes calculations in Syria, Libya, the Caucasus and the Black Sea.
  2. Bargaining power: Domestic production reduces the leverage that supplier states hold over Ankara and increases Türkiye's weight in alliance and export negotiations.
  3. Persisting limits: Türkiye still relies on foreign engines and subsystems in some programs, on NATO's integrated air and missile defense, and on allied nuclear deterrence. Neighbours are also modernizing, so the result is a more competitive balance and not an Ankara-dominated one.

Türkiye's Regional Position

Ankara's position, as expressed by the Presidency, the Ministry of National Defence (MSB), the SSB and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA), rests on the following points:

  • Self-reliance as a legal and strategic obligation. Turkish officials argue that Article 3 of the North Atlantic Treaty requires Allies to maintain and develop their capacity to resist armed attack through continuous and effective self-help. A stronger national industry therefore contributes to the Alliance. This line is repeated in Presidency and MSB statements.
  • Lessons from embargoes. The SSB and the Presidency point to the 1975–1978 US embargo and the 2019 restrictions as reasons to prioritize domestic design, production and maintenance capacity, so that operations and training do not depend on external approvals.
  • Defensive and proactive use under Article 51. Ankara states that its systems are used for border security and counter-terrorism under the inherent right of self-defense recognized in Article 51 of the UN Charter against the PKK/KCK/PYD-YPG (designated a terrorist organization by Türkiye, the United States, NATO and the European Union) and DAESH. See the guide on counter-terrorism at the source and Article 51.
  • Protection of maritime rights. Turkish officials link naval platforms such as TCG Anadolu, MİLGEM and the Reis-class to the protection of Türkiye's rights in its seas, the 870 km Mediterranean coastline and the Blue Homeland doctrine. See the guide on the Eastern Mediterranean and the Blue Homeland.
  • Responsible export policy. According to Ankara, exports are state-licensed and reviewed for foreign-policy implications. Turkish officials also say that the industry complements NATO, since interoperability is built into design standards, and that cooperation with allied firms continues.

On Cyprus, Ankara also argues that deterrence supports its guarantor role under the 1960 Treaty of Guarantee. For the political background, see the Cyprus issue and the two-state position.

Source Comparison

Question Common international framing Turkish primary-source framing What can be checked
What does 80% mean? Often repeated without definition, or treated with skepticism SSB cites it as the domestic share of programs, rising from about 20% The figure is an official estimate; engines, licences and some subsystems remain foreign
Is it compatible with NATO? Concern over S-400, divergent threat perceptions Article 3 of the North Atlantic Treaty; domestic industry strengthens the Alliance Türkiye remains a NATO member since 1952 and joined the 2025 spending goal; the S-400 dispute is real and unresolved
Why did Türkiye turn to domestic production? Seen as ambition or arms-race behaviour Response to the 1975–1978 embargo and later restrictions The embargo and the 2019 restrictions are documented
Exports and conflicts Concern about UAV use in Libya, Karabakh, Ethiopia and elsewhere Exports are licensed; support was based on agreements with recognized governments UN reports on Libya and NGO reports exist; Ankara disputes their characterization
Regional balance Framed as destabilizing, especially by Athens and Nicosia Framed as deterrence and defense of rights Neighbouring states are also rearming; no single actor holds an uncontested edge

For readers who want to check how this site handles disputed claims, see the Editorial Principles and Primary Source Standards and the Fact Check desk.

  • SSB (Presidency of Defence Industries): Türkiye's procurement and industrial policy authority, under the Presidency since 2018.
  • UAV / UCAV: Unmanned aerial vehicle / unmanned combat aerial vehicle. TB2, Akıncı and Aksungur are armed medium- to high-altitude drones; Kızılelma is a jet-powered unmanned combat aircraft.
  • MİLGEM: The national ship program (Milli Gemi) that produced Ada-class corvettes and İstif-class frigates.
  • HİSAR-O and SİPER: Medium- and long-range air defense systems that form part of the layered air defense architecture, also called Steel Dome (Çelik Kubbe).
  • CAATSA: The US Countering America's Adversaries Through Sanctions Act, used against SSB in December 2020.
  • Strategic autonomy: The ability to act and sustain operations without veto by external suppliers. It is not the same as autarky.

Related guides:

Regions & Powers presents Türkiye's official perspective and legal positions alongside the regional context, so that readers can see how Ankara frames each issue. Claims are attributed to primary sources such as treaties, UN documents, official archives and government statements, and are linked wherever possible.

Cross-Publication Dossiers & Sister Desk Perspectives

For complementary primary-source analysis across our specialist editorial network, consult:

Frequently asked questions

What is the Turkish defense industry domestic production rate?

Türkiye's Presidency of Defence Industries (SSB) says about 80% of major defense programs are now domestically developed or produced, compared with roughly 20% in the early 2000s. It is an official program-based estimate, not an audit of every component. Some engines, licensed designs and subsystems still come from abroad.

Which Turkish systems are the best known?

The best known are the Bayraktar TB2, Akıncı and Aksungur drones, the Kızılelma unmanned combat aircraft, the Hürjet trainer, the T129 ATAK helicopter and the KAAN fighter. Naval platforms include TCG Anadolu, MİLGEM warships and Reis-class submarines, and missile systems include ATMACA, SOM, HİSAR-O and SİPER. Several are in service with Turkish forces and some have been exported.

Does domestic production conflict with Türkiye's NATO commitments?

Ankara says no. It points to Article 3 of the North Atlantic Treaty, which calls on Allies to maintain their own capacity to resist attack. The main friction with Washington is the S-400 purchase, which led to Türkiye's removal from the F-35 program in 2019 and CAATSA sanctions in 2020. Türkiye remains a NATO member and has joined the Alliance's 2025 spending goal.

Why did Türkiye prioritize indigenous production?

Turkish officials cite the 1975–1978 US arms embargo after the 1974 Cyprus operation and the restrictions several European states placed on exports in 2019. These episodes convinced Ankara that dependence on foreign suppliers is a strategic risk. Both episodes are documented, although foreign governments describe their decisions as responses to specific policies.

Does the growth of Türkiye's defense industry change regional balances?

It changes them at the margins. Armed drones and precision missiles raise Türkiye's reach and bargaining power, and reduce supplier leverage over Ankara. However, neighbours such as Greece are also modernizing, and Türkiye still depends on some imported components and on NATO's wider air-defense and deterrence architecture.

Perspective & Editorial Transparency Note

Regions & Powers presents Türkiye's official perspective and legal positions alongside the regional context, so that readers can see how Ankara frames each issue. Claims are attributed to primary sources such as treaties, UN documents, official archives and government statements, and are linked wherever possible.

Author: Regions & Powers Editorial TeamAbout Regions & Powers →Editorial Principles →

Cross-Publication Perspectives & Cited Research

Related Dossiers Across Partner Publications

4 Partner Desks